Gpt Prompt Maker
Stop Getting Average Results. Start Using AI Like a Pro.
Six months ago I started building GPT Prompt Maker on evenings and weekends, alongside a full-time job. No ad spend. No launch hype. Just SEO, content, and word of mouth.
Today: over 650 signups, entirely organic. Two real paying customers. And the product is showing up in AI citations, meaning people are asking ChatGPT and other AI tools for prompt help, and getting pointed to us.
Here's the honest version of how we got here, and what I'd do differently.
What GPT Prompt Maker actually is
A structured prompt library and builder, over 500 templates across 29 categories, all built around proven frameworks like CO-STAR and RISEN instead of guesswork. Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. The pitch is simple: most people get mediocre AI output because they never learned how to ask well, and we make that structure automatic instead of something you have to study.
The growth so far
650+ signups came almost entirely from SEO and content, not paid acquisition. We publish structured guides, comparison articles, and free tools that rank for the terms people actually search when they're stuck writing a prompt. Slowly, that content started showing up as citations in AI answers themselves, which has been one of the more interesting side effects nobody plans for at the start.
The signup number looks good on paper. The honest number is 2 paying customers. That gap is the real story.
What six months actually taught me
Traffic is not the hard part. Getting someone to sign up for a free tool is not the hard part. The hard part is giving someone a reason to come back, and eventually a reason to pay. A library people browse once and forget is not a business. That realization reshaped what we're building next: instead of a library you visit, an agent that works inside the flow you're already in, improving and saving your prompts as you go, rather than asking you to remember to come back.
What's next
We're building that next layer now: a prompt-improvement agent that sits in your existing workflow rather than being another tab to open. Prompts stay free. The goal is turning a one-time visit into an ongoing habit.
If you write prompts for work or just want better answers out of ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini, come try the library: gptpromptmaker.com. If you're building something similar or have thoughts on the retention problem, I'd genuinely like to hear them in the comments.
1 Comment
The 650 signups vs. 2 paying customers makes the retention thesis interesting, but I’d be careful assuming the library format is the cause. Do you have evidence that users who return or use it repeatedly are more willing to pay, or is that still the assumption behind the agent shift?