I built a free decision gate for solo founders using AI agents — looking for blunt feedback
I’m a non-technical founder building with AI agents. The problem I keep running into isn’t generating more code — it’s knowing where the agent should stop and ask me.
So I shipped a small free beta called Founder Decision Gate.
You describe one proposed AI task, mark its risk, reversibility, and any high-impact actions. The tool returns one of three boundaries:
- Safe to execute within limits
- Human approval required
- Rewrite before delegation
It also creates a downloadable Safe Execution Brief that tells the agent what it owns, where human approval is required, and when to stop.
Privacy was a hard constraint for this first version: no account, no payment, no product analytics, and the form inputs stay in your browser. Please still use a redacted example.
Try the free beta: https://founder-decision-gate-beta.yeyetianqingyue.chatgpt.site/
I’m not selling anything here. I want to learn whether the boundary is actually useful. If you try it, I’d value one blunt answer:
- Did the verdict match your judgment?
- Which question felt unnecessary or missing?
- Would you use the downloaded brief with an AI agent again?
It’s a planning aid, not legal, security, compliance, or production authorization.
The downloadable brief feels like the more revealing part of the test.
Have you seen anyone actually reuse it with an agent yet, and if so, did they follow the boundary it set or override it once the agent started working?