Your client saw a ranking drop the same week SEO Twitter posted about a Google update. They want to know whether Core Web Vitals thresholds changed, whether their PageSpeed report is now obsolete, and whether you should drop everything to chase a new green score.
Short answer: the December 2025 and March 2026 core updates did not reset how Google measures LCP, INP, or CLS. Google re-evaluated which pages best satisfy search intent across the index. Page experience still matters. It is not the headline of these updates, and it is not a separate CWV algorithm you can fix in isolation.
What stayed the same for page experience work:
Good bands unchanged: LCP at or below 2.5s, INP below 200ms, CLS below 0.1
No single page experience score used for ranking; CWV are among many signals
CrUX field data is the ranking context; a one-off Lighthouse run is for debugging
None of those named core updates were labelled as page experience updates
What still shifts your CWV work in practice: competitors raise the floor, smaller core refreshes happen between named releases, and Discover traffic is a different surface from web Search. A drop with red CWV and thin content loses twice. Fixing only scripts without content review rarely recovers large drops.
Agency checklist after a core update:
Match the traffic change to the Search Status Dashboard window and wait until rollout finishes
Separate Discover vs Web in Search Console before blaming CWV
List high-value URLs with large position loss, then check Poor vs Good in the CWV report
Decide whether content quality or performance is the more likely driver before promising an INP-only recovery
Read more: How Google's Latest Algorithm Update Affects Core Web Vitals