Earlyhunt
Launch your AI product early, get discovered weekly.
I keep a launch-board-only list called Product Hunt Alternatives. It has 59 alternatives, does not treat normal directories as Product Hunt replacements, and does not take paid placements. I updated the editorial work in Sep 2026.
For an AI product, I would not paste the same sentence into 12 forms on Monday. I would do a few different jobs in order.
First, use one weekly hunt room where AI buyers are actually around. EarlyHunt is the AI-focused Monday UTC board in the Hunt network, and a launch can stay on the homepage for 7 days. Second, use one AI directory layer. TAAFT, Toolify, and FutureTools are useful examples, but I count them as one coverage layer, not three separate launches. Third, get evergreen comparison and GEO listings such as AlternativeTo and SaaSHub. Those can help with best tool for X searches that a launch board usually will not win. Then do Product Hunt on its own day, after the one-liner has already survived a quieter room.
On Best Launch Platforms, EarlyHunt is BLP 60. The job is simple: tryable AI products, on a weekly schedule. On my other scoring model it is among the AI-relevant weekly boards, with an overall 68. That model uses traffic 25%, audience 20%, SEO 20%, ease 15%, community 10%, and cost 10%.
The bad pattern is collecting badges from a hundred forms and calling that distribution. Three to six real events are better than that. If you ship AI, are you using a hunt board, a directory layer, or both?
I maintain Product Hunt Alternatives as a launch-board-only catalog with 59 alternatives. It excludes directories-as-Product-Hunt-substitutes and paid placements, and the editorial update is from Sep 2026. The point is to separate launch events from directory coverage, because they do different jobs.
For AI products, the pattern that keeps showing up in the data is a sequence, not twelve identical submissions in one day. First, use one weekly hunt room where AI buyers actually hang out. EarlyHunt is the AI-angled Monday UTC board in the Hunt network, with 7 days on the homepage. Second, use one coverage layer of AI directories such as TAAFT, Toolify, and FutureTools. Treat those as one layer, not three separate launches. Third, add evergreen comparison and GEO listings such as AlternativeTo and SaaSHub for best tool for X queries that boards usually do not win. Fourth, run Product Hunt last, on its own day, after the one-liner has survived a quieter room.
On Best Launch Platforms, EarlyHunt is BLP 60. Its job is clear: tryable AI products on a weekly cadence. On Product Hunt Alternatives, it ranks among AI-relevant weekly boards, with an overall 68 on that scoring model: traffic 25%, audience 20%, SEO 20%, ease 15%, community 10%, and cost 10%.
The failure mode I see is founders pasting the same blurb into 12 forms on Monday and measuring success by badges collected. Three to six real events beat a hundred dumped forms. If you ship AI, what is your current stack: hunt board, directory layer, or both?
Every time I "polish one more week" before putting something on EarlyHunt, the feedback just arrives later and hurts more. Half-done forced me to hear what people actually cared about vs what I was sanding.
How early do you usually show unfinished AI stuff to strangers?
I keep seeing founders build a giant spreadsheet and submit to 30 sites in two days.
If you're launching an AI tool, that time is usually better spent in 2-3 places where your buyers already hang out.
Fewer visitors. Better users.
I still research a lot of launch platforms (that's how bestlaunchplatforms.com started), but the ranking is less interesting than the job: feedback, early adopters, launch-day attention, or evergreen discovery.
What's your stack right now? One big bet or a short sequence?
I kept running into the same problem:
Every time I wanted to find a place to launch a product, I had to open 20+ tabs and figure out:
Is this platform still active?
Who is the audience?
Is it daily or weekly?
Is it actually useful for my type of product?
Does it cost anything?
Is there any SEO value?
How difficult is submission?
Should I launch here before or after another platform?
So I decided to turn that research into a product.
Product Hunt Alternatives is an independent catalog of launch platforms beyond Product Hunt:
https://producthunt-alternatives.com/
It currently has 59 alternatives, with a scoring system covering:
Traffic · Audience · SEO · Ease · Community · Cost
There are also:
→ Best-for rankings
→ Launch sequences
→ Platform comparisons
→ Launch Advisor
→ Launch guides and calendars
→ Field notes
→ Public API
→ Machine-readable catalog/API documentation
I'm deliberately keeping it independent: no paid placements and no affiliate layer.
The goal isn't to say:
“Here is the #1 website everyone should use.”
It's to help answer:
“Given what I'm building and what I want from this launch, where should I go?”
If you're an indie hacker, I'd love to know:
What's your current launch/distribution stack?
I've been researching startup launch platforms and looking at 70+ different places founders can launch products.
My conclusion so far:
More submissions ≠ better launch.
It's tempting to create a giant spreadsheet and submit your product to every launch board, directory, community, and discovery site you can find.
But I think that's often the wrong optimization.
Imagine you're launching a developer tool.
You could spend two days submitting it to 30 generic sites.
Or you could spend those two days finding 3 communities where developers who actually have the problem hang out.
The second approach may produce fewer visitors but much better users.
I think launch channels should be evaluated based on the job you're trying to accomplish:
Need feedback?
Find people who understand the problem.
Need early adopters?
Find communities with strong audience intent.
Need launch-day attention?
Consider launch boards.
Need long-term discovery?
Look at evergreen platforms.
Need developer adoption?
Go where developers already spend time.
Need pre-launch validation?
Build the waitlist first.
That's the thinking behind a project I've been working on called Best Launch Platforms.
It's an independent research site comparing 70+ launch channels across things like reach, intent, fairness, evergreen value, AI visibility, and ease.
But I'm much more interested in the discussion than the rankings.
What's your launch strategy?
Do you try to maximize the number of places you submit to, or do you focus on a handful of high-intent channels?
And what's one launch platform you'd recommend that most indie hackers overlook?
Short answer:
- Finding founders on Product Hunt
- Personal outreach (not blasting templates)
- Over-delivering after they signed up
- SEO that finally kicked in later
Long answer is in this video:
Would love to hear what moved the needle for you early on.
Curious what works for other founders in 2026 — directories? communities? niche launch sites?
I shared a curated list of 50+ places in this video: https://youtu.be/vAn3bn5M5UY
What’s been your best discovery channel after Product Hunt?
No extra cost. Every Premium ($17) and Premium Plus ($34) launch gets 9+ branded graphics for Product Hunt, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, etc.
Full demo: https://youtu.be/5UnvYo68GZY
Pricing: https://auraplusplus.com/pricing
Quick one for the IH community.
From Episode 2 of our Aura++ roundup, which of these 3 would you actually use?
🧠 Brainbaby — all-in-one AI (chat, video, app builder, docs)
🔀 WisGate — one API for top LLMs at unbeatable pricing
📊 Revshare — affiliate program with full click attribution, $0/month
Full video with all 9 tools: https://youtu.be/2NEsBroMkuE
Founders of these products — jump in and say hi 👋
Comment